Not a law firm. No legal advice, no attorney-client relationship — the published math, with its source.
LBTN

Car Accident Settlement Calculator

Estimate a car accident claim the way published consumer-legal literature describes it: economic damages, a severity multiplier or a per-diem figure, then your state’s fault rule and any statutory cap. Outputs a range with the arithmetic shown and the statute behind each adjustment cited.

Your data never leaves your device Learn more

Estimate only — not legal advice. This is the published math for car accident settlement calculator, shown as a range. Your actual outcome depends on facts, evidence, and decisions this page cannot see.

How serious is the injury?

No state selected. Comparative-negligence rules, damage caps, and filing deadlines all vary by state and any of them can change this figure substantially — in five jurisdictions, any fault of your own bars recovery entirely. Pick a state to apply its published law.

Estimated car accident settlement range

$27,000$35,000

Estimated range from $27,000 to $35,000.

Why a range: The multiplier method values pain and suffering as a band, not a point — a moderate injury is described in published consumer-legal literature as 2 to 3 times economic damages. The low end assumes the least favourable reading of your facts; the high end the most.

Insurers value claims with their own internal claims software, which weighs factors this calculator cannot see. This is the published consumer math, not an offer prediction.

  • No state selected, so no comparative-negligence rule, damage cap, or filing deadline has been applied. Every one of those can change the result substantially.
🎓 Understand this tool

What it is

A calculator for the two methods published consumer-legal literature describes for putting a figure on an injury claim, with your state’s fault rule, damage caps and filing deadline applied on top. It reports what those methods produce — not what an insurer will offer and not what a case is worth.

How it works

The multiplier method totals economic damages — medical bills, projected treatment, lost wages — and multiplies them by a factor reflecting severity, commonly described as between 1.5 and 5. The per-diem method assigns a daily amount across the recovery period instead. Neither is set by any statute; both are conventions. What IS law is everything applied afterwards: your state’s comparative-negligence rule decides whether and how your own share of fault reduces recovery, statutory caps can limit non-economic damages, and the limitation period ends the claim entirely once it passes. Those come from the state’s own statutes and are cited on the page.

Getting the most from it

  1. Enter economic damages first — bills to date, projected treatment, and wages actually lost. These are the figures everything else is built from, and they should come from itemised documents.
  2. Pick the severity band by reading the descriptions, not by guessing a number. The band is the single biggest lever in the calculation.
  3. Select your state so its fault rule, caps and deadline apply. Without a state, none of the law is in the figure.
  4. Try the per-diem method as a cross-check. If the two methods disagree wildly, that gap is worth understanding before any conversation.

Reading your result

Read the range as a range. The low end assumes the least favourable view of your facts and the high end the most; the truth of any particular claim sits somewhere in that span or outside it entirely. Insurers value claims with internal software weighing factors this calculation cannot see, so treat the figure as a way to understand the method rather than a forecast of an offer.

What it can't tell you

This cannot assess liability, judge how strong the evidence is, account for pre-existing conditions, policy limits, liens, comparative fault a jury might actually find, or the difference between what a claim is worth and what a defendant can pay. It does not include lost earning capacity, which needs an economist rather than a formula. For any of that, talk to a lawyer licensed in your state.

Frequently asked questions

Two methods appear across published consumer-legal literature. The multiplier method adds up economic damages — medical bills and lost wages — and multiplies them by a factor reflecting how serious the injury was. The per-diem method assigns a daily amount for the length of recovery instead. Neither is law. Both are conventions, and your state’s comparative-negligence rule and any damage cap then apply on top.

Part of: How injury settlements are valued on paper

Change alerts — when a state revises the guideline or deadline behind this page

One email when the numbers change. Double opt-in, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.